On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25.02.25 12:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Ping? Especially ...
> > 
> > On 04.02.25 12:33, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > Xenstored is using libxenctrl for only one purpose: to get information
> > > about state of domains.
> > > 
> > > This patch series is removing that dependency by introducing a new
> > > stable interface which can be used by xenstored instead.
> > > 
> > > There was a RFC series sent out 3 years ago, which I have taken as a
> > > base and by addressing all comments from back then.
> > > 
> > > The main differences since that RFC series are:
> > > 
> > > - Instead of introducing an new main hypercall for a stable management
> > >    interface I have just added a new domctl sub-op, as requested in 2021.
> > > 
> > > - I have added a new library libxenmanage for easy use of the new
> > >    stable hypervisor interface. Main motivation for adding the library
> > >    was the recent attempt to decouple oxenstored from the Xen git tree.
> > >    By using the new library, oxenstored could benefit in the same way as
> > >    xenstored from the new interface: it would be possible to rely on
> > >    stable libraries only.
> > > 
> > > - Mini-OS has gained some more config options recently, so it was rather
> > >    easy to make xenstore[pvh]-stubdom independent from libxenctrl, too.
> > > 
> > > Please note that the last 4 patches can be committed only after the
> > > related Mini-OS patch "config: add support for libxenmanage" has gone in
> > > AND the Mini-OS commit-id has been updated in Config.mk accordingly! The
> > > Mini-OS patch has been Acked already, so it can go in as soon as patch
> > > 5 of this series (the one introducing libxenmanage) has been committed.
> > > 
> > > As patches 1 and 2 change current behavior, Jan didn't want to give his
> > > Ack (he didn't reject the patch either). So I'm asking other "Rest"
> > > maintainers to look at those patches specifically.
> > 
> > ... patches 1 and 2 could need an additional opinion.
> 
> And another ping.
> 
> One of Andrew, Stefano, Julien, Roger, Anthony, Mical: Please have a look.
> 
> The related discussion between Jan and me can be found here (patches 2 and 3):
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20250107101711.5980-1-jgr...@suse.com/

I didn't do an in-details review but based on Jan's comments and your
replies, I think they are an improvement. If someone else wants to do a
proper review, they would be welcome.

Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to