Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com> writes:
> Move the check on having a Secure TSC to the common tsc_early_init() so
> that it's obvious that having a Secure TSC is conditional, and to prepare
> for adding TDX to the mix (blindly initializing *both* SNP and TDX TSC
> logic looks especially weird).
Agree.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@amd.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 3 ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> index e6ce4ca72465..dab386f782ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> @@ -3284,9 +3284,6 @@ void __init snp_secure_tsc_init(void)
> {
> unsigned long long tsc_freq_mhz;
>
> - if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
> - return;
> -
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);
> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index 5a16271b7a5c..09ca0cbd4f31 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1514,7 +1514,8 @@ void __init tsc_early_init(void)
> if (is_early_uv_system())
> return;
>
> - snp_secure_tsc_init();
> + if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
> + snp_secure_tsc_init();
>
> if (!determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies(true))
> return;
> --
> 2.48.1.362.g079036d154-goog
