On 03.02.2025 17:38, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > On 2/3/25 5:22 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> The first two patches are functionally independent, and they're presented >> here merely in the order I came to notice the respective issues. At least >> patch 2 wants seriously considering for 4.20. >> >> While alternatives were considered for patch 2, it's left as it was in v1 >> for now. The disposition there depends on (a) the four new patches, in >> particular what the last patch does and (b) backporting considerations >> (we probably don't want to backport any of the radix tree tidying). >> >> 1: AMD/IOMMU: drop stray MSI enabling >> 2: x86/PCI: init segments earlier > > R-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko<oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com> for first two > patches. > > For others it seems like nothing serious will happen if to merge them after > 4.20.
It took me some time to actually take two and two together, but: With the observation underlying patch 6, patch 2 can actually be dropped altogether, with what is now patch 5 taking the role of the bug fix. That'll make what is now patch 3 a strict prereq then, though. I'll cut a shrunk down v3. Jan
