>>> On 04.07.18 at 19:15, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 04/07/18 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 03.07.18 at 22:55, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> This is mainly prep work for the following patch, but this specific >>> abstraction is also specifically useful for the future auditing logic. >>> >>> Not all of msr_vcpu_policy will be interesting from a domain building >>> perspective, but some soon-to-appear fields will be (SGX Launch Hash >>> specifically). The exact split of MSRs between domain and vcpu policies is >>> internal to Xen and liable to change moving forwards, so treat the two >>> structures consistently from the start to avoid problems in the future. >> I hope the utility of this grouping will become evident in later >> patches. > > Probably moreso in the followup series with the auditing/subset logic, > but patch 13 does provide the first aspect.
Does it? It's a faint hint at best, as long as x86_policies_are_compatible() is all empty. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
