On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:03:39PM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > We then had a discussion around why the positive benefits didn't materialize: > * Andrew and a few other believe that the model isn't broken, but that the > issue is with how we > develop. In other words, moving to a 9 months model will *not* fix the > underlying issues, but > merely provide an incentive not to fix them. > * Issues highlighted were: > * 2-3 months stabilizing period is too long
I think one of the goals with the 6 month release cycle was to shrink the stabilizing period, but it didn't turn that way, and the stabilizing period is quite similar with a 6 or a 9 month release cycle. Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
