On 14.11.2024 15:57, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > @@ -5517,7 +5524,8 @@ int map_pages_to_xen( > L3T_LOCK(current_l3page); > ol3e = *pl3e; > > - if ( cpu_has_page1gb && IS_L3E_ALIGNED(virt, mfn) && > + if ( cpu_has_page1gb && > + (!(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) || IS_L3E_ALIGNED(virt, mfn)) && > nr_mfns >= (1UL << (L3_PAGETABLE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)) && > !(flags & (_PAGE_PAT | MAP_SMALL_PAGES)) ) > { > @@ -5636,7 +5644,7 @@ int map_pages_to_xen( > if ( !pl2e ) > goto out; > > - if ( IS_L2E_ALIGNED(virt, mfn) && > + if ( (!(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) || IS_L2E_ALIGNED(virt, mfn)) && > (nr_mfns >= (1u << PAGETABLE_ORDER)) && > !(flags & (_PAGE_PAT|MAP_SMALL_PAGES)) ) > {
Upon inspecting Andrew's report of crashes I noticed that this can't be quite right. We can't entirely skip the alignment check when non-present mappings are requested; we merely need to limit the check to the VA. In a reply to the 1st v2 I actually had it arranged to match that requirement: if ( (cpu_has_page1gb || !(flags & _PAGE_PRESENT)) && IS_L3E_ALIGNED(virt, flags & _PAGE_PRESENT ? mfn : _mfn(0)) && nr_mfns >= (1UL << (L3_PAGETABLE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)) && !(flags & (_PAGE_PAT | MAP_SMALL_PAGES)) ) Yet then I didn't pay attention to the difference when reviewing the 2nd v2 (that versioning issue of course isn't helping here either). I'm afraid I can't (yet) connect the observed bad behavior with this issue, though. Jan