On 21/10/2024 2:54 pm, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 07:20:54PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> pvh_init() sets up the mbi pointer, but leaves mbi_p at 0.  This isn't
>> compatbile with multiboot_fill_boot_info() starting from the physical 
>> address,
>> in order to remove the use of the mbi pointer.
>>
>> Fixes: 038826b61e85 ("x86/boot: move x86 boot module counting into a new 
>> boot_info struct")
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
>> CC: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
>>
>> This is a testiment to how tangled the boot code really is.
> Did it causes crash in some boot configuration? If so, did some test
> tripped on this (from what I see, not a gitlab one)?

OSSTest found it.

e1t2d0w-0005rf...@osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org

I'm writing a PVSHIM test for Gitlab CI right now, seeing as OSSTest is
going away imminently.

https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/andyhhp/xen/-/pipelines/1505384944

~Andrew

Reply via email to