On 07.10.2024 17:52, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > It was trying to do too many things at once and there was no clear way of > defining what it was meant to do. This commit splits the function in two. > > 1. A function to return the FPU to power-on reset values. > 2. A x87/SSE state loader (equivalent to the old function when it took > a data pointer). > > The old function also had a concept of "default" values that the FPU > would be configured for in some cases but not others. This patch removes > that 3rd vague initial state and replaces it with power-on reset. > > While doing this make sure the abridged control tag is consistent with the > manuals and starts as 0xFF > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vall...@cloud.com> > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > -- > @Jan: The patch changed substantially. Are you still ok with this R-by?
I am. However in such a situation imo you'd better drop the tag, for it to be re-offered (if desired). It can very well happen that the person simply doesn't notice the question pointed at them. Jan