On 9/3/24 19:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 30/08/2024 10:46 pm, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
Transition the memory map info to be held in struct boot_info.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <[email protected]>
---
  xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h |  5 +++++
  xen/arch/x86/setup.c                | 12 +++++++++---
  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h 
b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h
index d2ca077d2356..e785ed1c5982 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h
@@ -8,11 +8,16 @@
  #ifndef __XEN_X86_BOOTINFO_H__
  #define __XEN_X86_BOOTINFO_H__
+#include <xen/types.h>
+
  struct boot_info {
      unsigned int nr_mods;
const char *boot_loader_name;
      const char *cmdline;
+
+    paddr_t mmap_addr;
+    uint32_t mmap_length;

memmap please.

Ack.

@@ -1200,13 +1206,13 @@ void asmlinkage __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned 
long mbi_p)
      {
          memmap_type = "Xen-e820";
      }
-    else if ( mbi->flags & MBI_MEMMAP )
+    else if ( boot_info->mmap_addr )
      {
          memmap_type = "Multiboot-e820";
-        while ( bytes < mbi->mmap_length &&
+        while ( bytes < boot_info->mmap_length &&
                  e820_raw.nr_map < ARRAY_SIZE(e820_raw.map) )
          {
-            memory_map_t *map = __va(mbi->mmap_addr + bytes);
+            memory_map_t *map = __va(boot_info->mmap_addr + bytes);
/*
               * This is a gross workaround for a BIOS bug. Some bootloaders do

This is some very gnarly logic.  pvh_init() plays with e820_raw behind
the scenes and doesn't set MBI_MEMMAP.

Perhaps for later cleanup too, this logic wants folding into the new
multiboot_fill_boot_info() and leave __start_xen().

I can add another patch that focuses on moving this to multiboot_fill_boot_info(). If there is also a transition to pvh_fill_boot_info(), then the question I have is, should this be better served as a separate function similar to my proposal with the command line parsing?

v/r,
dps

Reply via email to