Ping
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:05 PM Andrei Stan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 6:22 PM Jürgen Groß <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 05.07.24 16:59, Andrei Stan wrote:
> > > Currently only shared libraries build with USE_PTHREAD enabled.
> > >
> > > This patch adds the macro also to xs.o.
> > >
> > > Backport: 4.18+ # maybe older
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Stan <[email protected]>
> >
> > Commit dde3e02b7068 did that explicitly, stating that phtreads are
> > not compatible with static linking.
> >
> > Was that reasoning wrong?
> >
> > Juergen
> > ---
> > > ---
> > > tools/libs/store/Makefile | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/libs/store/Makefile b/tools/libs/store/Makefile
> > > index 0649cf8307..c6f147c72f 100644
> > > --- a/tools/libs/store/Makefile
> > > +++ b/tools/libs/store/Makefile
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ CFLAGS += -include $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/config.h
> > > CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_libxentoolcore)
> > >
> > > xs.opic: CFLAGS += -DUSE_PTHREAD
> > > +xs.o: CFLAGS += -DUSE_PTHREAD
> > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_Linux),y)
> > > xs.opic: CFLAGS += -DUSE_DLSYM
> > > endif
>
> It was a pretty nasty situation, giving some context, this is for a Go based
> CLI
> tool and some things in there are multithreaded, but i don't think
> calling in the
> bindings happens anywhere in parallel. Without this patch there would be
> some sort of race conditions (or so I assume from the debugging i've done)
> happening withing the xen/tools code, making it impossible to start a domain.
>
> In this case there were no issues in linking pthreads statically. I was not
> even
> aware of that being a possible issue. Is it really?
>
> Also I am not too sure how much that code path is actually tested, probably
> the
> majority of the testing is done with dynamic builds.
>
> Andrei
