On 26/08/2024 12:59 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 23.08.2024 01:06, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> ... and drop generic_hweight32(). >> >> As noted previously, the only two users of hweight32() and they're both >> singleton callers in __init paths, so it's not interesting to have a sub-GPR >> optimised generic. > I think it's clear what is meant, but the part of the sentence ahead of > the comma is a little bumpy. As to not interesting: Perhaps indeed not > right now, but new uses may appear and generally the overly wide > operations may be (slightly) more expensive. Of course we can deal with > the need when it arises, so ...
Oh yes, that is wonky. I'll rephrase. >> No functional change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Thanks. ~Andrew
