On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 02:11:32AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 26.06.18 at 09:57, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:47:12AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> In this case, just like xcr0_accum, nonlazy_xstate_used should always be > >> set to the intended new value, rather than possibly leaving the flag set > >> from a prior state load. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > > > Why? Looking at the code it is in fact used as a boolean. > > Its boolean nature is irrelevant. The question is whether fully new state > is loaded (in which case the flag should be set according to this state, > without regard to the prior value of the flag) vs ...
I see. I misunderstood your intent. Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
