On 02.08.2024 13:02, oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com wrote:
> There is something what we need is mentioned here:
> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-asm-manual/blob/main/riscv-asm.md#instruction-aliases
> But the problem is that is "de-facto" standard, but not really standard
> instruction. Anyway, I will update the patch to use (C0001073) instead
> of ebreak.

Well, the official spec, in the C extension, mentions 0x0000 as "defined
illegal instruction". Wouldn't using that work? It's going to be undefined
no matter whether the C extension is actually implemented.

Jan

Reply via email to