Jürgen Groß, le jeu. 25 juil. 2024 08:25:18 +0200, a ecrit: > On 25.07.24 00:44, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Jürgen Groß, le mar. 23 juil. 2024 08:36:13 +0200, a ecrit: > > > On 22.07.24 23:35, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Juergen Gross, le lun. 22 juil. 2024 17:01:41 +0200, a ecrit: > > > > > Remove the sanity_check() function, as it is used nowhere. > > > > > > > > > > Since any application linked with Mini-OS can't call sanity_check() > > > > > either (there is no EXPORT_SYMBOL for it), there is zero chance of > > > > > breaking any use case. > > > > > > > > Don't we still want to keep it around, at least as formal documentation > > > > of the expected status of the list? > > > > > > Hmm, is it really worth the extra code? > > > > I have already seen such kind of piece of code getting very convenient > > when tracking odd bugs. > > What about putting it under CONFIG_TEST then?
Ok ! Samuel
