On 24/07/24 11:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.07.2024 18:48, Federico Serafini wrote:
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ safe."
-doc_end
-doc_begin="Switch clauses ending with an explicit comment indicating the fallthrough intention are safe."
--config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\*
[fF]all ?through.? \\*/.*$,0..1))))"}
+-config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\*
[fF]all ?through\\.? \\*/.*$,0..2))))"}
-doc_end
-doc_begin="Switch statements having a controlling expression of enum type deliberately do not have a default case: gcc -Wall enables -Wswitch which warns (and breaks the build as we use -Werror) if one of the enum labels is missing from the switch."
This patch doesn't apply. There's a somewhat similar entry, but its doc_begin
line is sufficiently different. I have no idea what's going on here; there's
no dependency stated anywhere.
Right, this patch depends on [1] which has not been committed yet.
[1]
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2024-06/msg01347.html
--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.
Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)
