On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 10.06.2024 16:20, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > @@ -2589,6 +2589,28 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, bool verbose) > > affinity); > > } > > > > + if ( desc->arch.move_in_progress && > > + !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpu_online_map) && > > Btw - any reason you're open-coding !cpu_online() here? I've noticed this > in the context of patch 7, where a little further down a !cpu_online() is > being added. Those likely all want to be consistent.
No reason really - just me not realizing we had that helper. Can adjust in next version. Thanks, Roger.
