Hi Jan,
On 4/24/2024 2:22 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.04.2024 05:34, Henry Wang wrote:
From: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garh...@amd.com>
Move struct range, rangeset and removed static from first_range and
next_range().
NAK, for going against what we do elsewhere (limiting exposure of internals).
At least as long as the justification isn't any better than ...
IRQs and IOMEMs for nodes are stored as rangeset in the dynamic node addition
part. While removing the nodes we need to access every IRQ and IOMEM ranges to
unmap IRQ and IOMEM from the domain.
... this. You're aware of rangeset_report_ranges() and
rangeset_consume_ranges(),
aren't you? If neither is suitable for your purpose, can you explain what you
need in addition?
I understand your concern. I will check if I can refactor this patch
using the suggested helpers. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Henry
Jan
