On 19.04.2024 12:02, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Livepatch payloads containing symbols that belong to init sections can only > lead to page faults later on, as by the time the livepatch is loaded init > sections have already been freed. > > Refuse to resolve such symbols and return an error instead. > > Note such resolutions are only relevant for symbols that point to undefined > sections (SHN_UNDEF), as that implies the symbol is not in the current payload > and hence must either be a Xen or a different livepatch payload symbol. > > Do not allow to resolve symbols that point to __init_begin, as that address is > also unmapped. On the other hand, __init_end is not unmapped, and hence allow > resolutions against it. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > --- > Changes since v1: > - Fix off-by-one in range checking.
Which means you addressed Andrew's comment while at the same time extending the scope of ... > @@ -310,6 +311,21 @@ int livepatch_elf_resolve_symbols(struct livepatch_elf > *elf) > break; > } > } > + > + /* > + * Ensure not an init symbol. Only applicable to Xen symbols, as > + * livepatch payloads don't have init sections or equivalent. > + */ > + else if ( st_value >= (uintptr_t)&__init_begin && > + st_value < (uintptr_t)&__init_end ) > + { > + printk(XENLOG_ERR LIVEPATCH > + "%s: symbol %s is in init section, not resolving\n", > + elf->name, elf->sym[i].name); ... what I raised concern about (and I had not seen any verbal reply to that, I don't think). Jan