On 19.04.2024 09:49, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > On 2024-04-19 09:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 19.04.2024 09:16, Nicola Vetrini wrote: >>> The ECLAIR service STD.emptrecd is being deprecated; hence, as a >>> preventive >>> measure, STD.anonstct is used here, which for Xen's purposes has >>> equivalent >>> functionality. >> >> I'm sorry, but no, this still does not clarify things enough. It is >> still >> entirely unclear how "empty record" can reasonably be substituted by >> "anonymous struct". Even the expansion of the respective abbreviations >> continues to be just a guess. > > anonstct checks for structs with no named members,
So "anonstct" != "anonymous structures". As indicated, part of the description wants to be de-ciphering of these acronyms, so they can make sense to readers. Jan > hence also empty > structs, but only the former is an undefined behaviour for C99. >
