On 15/04/2024 11:25 am, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I saw this patch was committed. I have one question this may require
> some adjustment.
>
> On 08/04/2024 17:11, John Ernberg wrote:
>> ---
>>   xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile |   1 +
>>   xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile
>> b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile
>> index 8632f4115f..bec6e55d1f 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile
>> @@ -9,5 +9,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ALL_PLAT)   += sunxi.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ALL64_PLAT) += thunderx.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ALL64_PLAT) += xgene-storm.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ALL64_PLAT) += brcm-raspberry-pi.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ALL64_PLAT) += imx8qm.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MPSOC_PLATFORM)  += xilinx-zynqmp.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MPSOC_PLATFORM)  += xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.o
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
>> b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..3600a073e8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>
> The majority of Xen code is using GPL-2.0-only. In the early days for
> Xen on Arm we started to use GPLv2+ which I consider it was a mistake.
> Unfortunately this started to spread as people copied/pasted the same
> copyright headers.
>
> So can you confirm whether you intended to use GPL-2.0+? If not would
> you be able to send a patch to adjust it? (Better to it before there
> are more modifications).

Julien: I've called you out multiple times before.

Don't ever bully contributors into changing licensing.  It is
unacceptable behaviour, and in most cases - including this one by the
looks of things - not legal.


John: Thankyou for your contribution.  It has been made under a license
compatible with the rest of Xen.  There is no need to make any change,
and please do not feel pressured into doing so.

~Andrew

Reply via email to