On 04.04.2024 09:49, Federico Serafini wrote: > MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3 states: "An unconditional `break' statement > shall terminate every switch-clause". > > In order to meet the requirements to deviate the rule: > 1) refactor the for loop to make the switch-clause ending with a > return statement (note that adding a break at the end of the > switch-clause would result in a violation of Rule 2.1 > "A project shall not contain unreachable code"); > 2) add pseudo-keyword fallthrough. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.seraf...@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
