Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] libelf: Expand ELF note printing

[Jan Beulich]

On 13.03.2024 20:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> @@ -217,6 +225,15 @@ elf_errorstatus elf_xen_parse_note(struct elf_binary 
> *elf,
>      case XEN_ELFNOTE_PHYS32_ENTRY:
>          parms->phys_entry = val;
>          break;
> +
> +    case XEN_ELFNOTE_L1_MFN_VALID:
> +        if ( elf_uval(elf, note, descsz) != 2 * sizeof(uint64_t) )
> +            return -1;

elf_note_numeric() use sites don't have such a check. Why would we need
one here, and even more so causing a error to be raised when in reality
the supplied values (still) aren't consumed? Furthermore the documentation
says "pairs" (plural) for a reason. Finally maddr_t-sized only happens to
mean uint64_t on all architectures we presently support.

Jan

> +        elf_msg(elf, "mask: %#"PRIx64" val: %#"PRIx64"\n",
> +                elf_note_numeric_array(elf, note, 8, 0),
> +                elf_note_numeric_array(elf, note, 8, 1));
> +        break;
>      }
>      return 0;
>  }