Hi Jan,

On 3/7/2024 7:04 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.03.2024 11:38, Henry Wang wrote:
Below error can be seen when doing Yocto build of the toolstack:

| io.c: In function 'p9_error':
| io.c:684:5: error: ignoring return value of 'strerror_r' declared
   with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Werror=unused-result]
|   684 |     strerror_r(err, ring->buffer, ring->ring_size);
|       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Fix the build by using strerror() to replace strerror_r(). Since
strerror() is thread-unsafe, use a separate local mutex to protect
the action. The steps would then become: Acquire the mutex first,
invoke strerror(), copy the string from strerror() to the designated
buffer and then drop the mutex.


Fixes: f4900d6d69b5 ("9pfsd: allow building with old glibc")

I will add this tag in v3.
Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <xin.wa...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>

Thanks!

albeit there are a number of cosmetic aspects I'd have done differently
(see bottom of mail). The one thing I'd really like to ask for it a
comment ...

--- a/tools/9pfsd/io.c
+++ b/tools/9pfsd/io.c
@@ -680,8 +680,18 @@ static bool name_ok(const char *str)
  static void p9_error(struct ring *ring, uint16_t tag, uint32_t err)
  {
      unsigned int erroff;
+    static pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+    char *strerror_str;
+    RING_IDX strerror_len = 0, copy_len = 0;
+
... here explaining why strerror_r() isn't used. Unless other comments
arise and a v3 would be needed, I'd add

     /*
      * While strerror_r() exists, it comes in a POSIX and a GNU flavor.
      * Let's try to avoid trying to be clever with determining which
      * one it is that the underlying C library offers, when really we
      * don't expect this function to be called very often.
      */

while committing.

Since I am working on a V3 which will be sent out soon, please don't bother :) I will
handle it from my side.

Anyway it'll need a maintainer ack first.

+    pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
+    strerror_str = strerror(err);
+    strerror_len = strlen(strerror_str) + 1;
+    copy_len = min(strerror_len, ring->ring_size);
+    memcpy(ring->buffer, strerror_str, copy_len);
+    ((char *)(ring->buffer))[copy_len - 1] = '\0';
+    pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
- strerror_r(err, ring->buffer, ring->ring_size);
      erroff = add_string(ring, ring->buffer, strlen(ring->buffer));
      fill_buffer(ring, P9_CMD_ERROR, tag, "SU",
                  erroff != ~0 ? ring->str + erroff : "cannot allocate memory",
     pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
     str = strerror(err);
     len = min(strlen(str), ring->ring_size - 1);

This actually will fire below errors on my build env, hence I separated them with a different variable.

tools/include/xen-tools/common-macros.h:38:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [-Werror]
|    38 |         (void) (&_x == &_y);                    \
|       |                     ^~
| io.c:695:11: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
|   695 |     len = min(strlen(str), MAX_ERRSTR_LEN - 1);;
|       |           ^~~
| cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

     memcpy(ring->buffer, str, len);
     ((char *)ring->buffer)[len] = '\0';
     pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);

I will follow your style in V3 if you don't have any specific comment on the error that I posted above (plus also not strongly disagree with my approach in v2).

Kind regards,
Henry

Jan


Reply via email to