On 04/03/24 11:28, Federico Serafini wrote:
Update ECLAIR configuration to take into account the deviations agreed during MISRA meetings.Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.seraf...@bugseng.com> --- Changes in v2: - rephrased to make sure the deviation is not interpreted as a suggestion. --- automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 4 ++++ docs/misra/deviations.rst | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl index 02eae39786..9ac3ee4dfd 100644 --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl @@ -378,6 +378,10 @@ explicit comment indicating the fallthrough intention is present." -config=MC3R1.R16.3,reports+={safe, "any_area(end_loc(any_exp(text(^(?s).*/\\* [fF]all ?through.? \\*/.*$,0..1))))"} -doc_end+-doc_begin="A switch statement with a single switch clause and no default label may be used in place of an equivalent if statement if it is considered to improve readability."+-config=MC3R1.R16.6,switch_clauses+={deliberate, "default(0)"} +-doc_end + # # Series 18. # diff --git a/docs/misra/deviations.rst b/docs/misra/deviations.rst index 123c78e20a..ce855ddae6 100644 --- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst @@ -322,6 +322,12 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules: - /\* Fallthrough \*/ - /\* Fallthrough. \*/+ * - R16.6+ - A switch statement with a single switch clause and no default label may + be used in place of an equivalent if statement if it is considered to + improve readability. + - Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR. + * - R20.7 - Code violating Rule 20.7 is safe when macro parameters are used: (1) as function arguments;
I forgot the "--reroll-count", I'm sorry. -- Federico Serafini, M.Sc. Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)
