On 29/02/2024 13:40, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 29/02/2024 12:37, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>>
>> On 29/02/2024 13:35, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 29/02/2024 12:13, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>>> Since commit bd1001db0af1 ("xen/arm: arm32: Allow Xen to boot on
>>>> unidentified CPUs"), it's been possible to boot 32-bit Xen on ARMv8A CPUs
>>>> in AArch32 state (assuming HW supports EL2 execution in AArch32). Clarify
>>>> the support statement and mark it as Tech Preview, as this use case is
>>>> uncommon and hasn't really been tested/hardened.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> SUPPORT.md | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md
>>>> index a90d1108c9d9..acc61230bb5e 100644
>>>> --- a/SUPPORT.md
>>>> +++ b/SUPPORT.md
>>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ supported in this document.
>>>> Status: Supported
>>> I would consider to use 'Status, Xen in aarch64 mode: Supported' and then...
>>>
>>>> Status, Cortex A57 r0p0-r1p1: Supported, not security supported
>>>> Status, Cortex A77 r0p0-r1p0: Supported, not security supported
>>>> + Status, Xen in AArch32 mode: Tech Preview
>>>
>>> ... move this line closer. What do you think?
>> That works for me too (+AArch64 instead of aarch64).
>
> Ah yes. I keep forgetting capitalizing properly :).
>
>> Shall I respin the patch?
>
> Up to you. I am happy to fix it. But I will wait a day or two just to
> give a chance for the others to comment.
That works for me, let's wait for Bertrand and Stefano.
~Michal
