On 12.12.2023 10:47, Juergen Gross wrote: > Rename the recursive spin_lock() functions by replacing the trailing > "_recursive" with a leading "r". > > Switch the parameter to be a pointer to rspinlock_t. > > Remove the indirection through a macro, as it is adding only complexity > without any gain.
Considering we aren't aware of any leveraging of this, doing so is probably okay. Still I think it was done that way for a reason. Plus of course if we undo the indirection here, sooner or later we should also undo similar indirection elsewhere. > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Jan
