Hi John,
On 31/01/2024 11:50, John Ernberg wrote:
Allow the uart to probe also with iMX8QXP. The ip-block is the same as in the
QM,
only the compatible is needed.
Signed-off-by: John Ernberg <john.ernb...@actia.se>
With one remark below:
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
---
xen/drivers/char/imx-lpuart.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/char/imx-lpuart.c b/xen/drivers/char/imx-lpuart.c
index 77f70c2719..c85e81109a 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/char/imx-lpuart.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/char/imx-lpuart.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int __init imx_lpuart_init(struct dt_device_node
*dev,
static const struct dt_device_match imx_lpuart_dt_compat[] __initconst =
{
DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE("fsl,imx8qm-lpuart"),
+ DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE("fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart"),
IIUC the binding, the Device-Tree node compatible should have both
fsl,imx8qm-lpuart and fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart. In fact, the Linux driver
doesn't recognize the first compatible.
So maybe we can remove the first one.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
