On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 12:22 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 22.12.2023 16:13, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com> > > --- > > Changes in V3: > > - new patch > > --- > > README | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/README b/README > > index c8a108449e..1015a285c0 100644 > > --- a/README > > +++ b/README > > @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ provided by your OS distributor: > > - For ARM 64-bit: > > - GCC 5.1 or later > > - GNU Binutils 2.24 or later > > + - For RISC-V 64-bit: > > + - GCC 13.2.1 or later > > + - GNU Binutils 2.40 or later > > That's pretty new. For gcc that's even newer than the newest release. > If older versions really won't do, I don't think you can leave this > unjustified (by having an empty description). Till now gcc 13.2 has > served me well, and iirc 13.1, 12.3, and 12.2 were fine, too. It can be 12.2.0 for GCC and 2.39 for GNU Binutils. ( it is toolchain which is used by contrainer for RISC-V in Xen ). I'll update versions then.
But could you please explain again why it can't be 13.2.1 ( it is a version which I have in my distribution, so it is the reason why I used this version in README file ) ? ~ Oleksii
