On 2023-12-19 11:51, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 2023-12-19 11:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.12.2023 10:02, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/docs/misra/exclude-list.json
+++ b/docs/misra/exclude-list.json
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@
"rel_path": "include/acpi/acglobal.h",
"comment": "Imported from Linux, ignore for now"
},
+ {
+ "rel_path": "include/acpi/acmacros.h",
+ "comment": "Imported from Linux, ignore for now"
+ },
Together with what's already there (in context), wouldn't it better be
the entire directory then which is excluded, or at least all
include/acpi/ac*.h collectively (and perhaps also
include/acpi/platform/ac*.h)?
Jan
+Cc Luca Fancellu
Sure. I wasn't certain which files are imported from ACPI CA and which
aren't.
I'm also not sure whether "include/acpi/ac*.h" would be properly
recognized by other tooling that uses exclude-list.json (only cppcheck
I think). I Cc-ed Luca Fancellu on this.
It occurred to me that it's surely ok to use "include/acpi/ac*" and
"include/acpi/platform/ac*".
--
Nicola Vetrini, BSc
Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)
