On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:19:35AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 13.12.2023 14:51, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > --- a/livepatch-build > > +++ b/livepatch-build > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > # script. > > > > SCRIPTDIR="$(readlink -f $(dirname $(type -p $0)))" > > +WORKDIR="$(readlink -f -- .)" > > More for my own education than anything else: Isn't the (standard) pwd > utility intended to be the "canonical" way of getting at the current > directory? Its -P option (apparently what would be needed to match the > -f used above) is also a standard one afaict.
Hm, yes, having looked at it `pwd -P` would also be fine. I've used readlink because that's what is used thorough the script. Thanks, Roger.
