Hi Jens,

> On 13 Dec 2023, at 11:32, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklan...@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> Until now has an unsupported FF-A request been reported back with
> ARM_SMCCC_ERR_UNKNOWN_FUNCTION in register x0. A FF-A caller would
> rather expect FFA_ERROR in x0 and FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED in x2 so update
> ffa_handle_call() to return true and with the cpu_user_regs updated.
> 
> Fixes: 38846de2176b ("xen/arm: tee: add a primitive FF-A mediator")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklan...@linaro.org>

With the Nit from Michal fixed in the commit message (could be done on commit):
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com>

Cheers
Bertrand

> ---
> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> index 183528d13388..98905fec7967 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> @@ -1477,7 +1477,8 @@ static bool ffa_handle_call(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> 
>     default:
>         gprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "ffa: unhandled fid 0x%x\n", fid);
> -        return false;
> +        set_regs_error(regs, FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED);
> +        return true;
>     }
> }
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


Reply via email to