On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > @@ -1261,6 +1269,7 @@ struct xen_sysctl {
> > > struct xen_sysctl_livepatch_op livepatch;
> > > #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> > > struct xen_sysctl_cpu_policy cpu_policy;
> > > + struct xen_sysctl_test_smc smc;
> >
> > Imo the field name would better be test_smc (leaving aside Stefano's
> > comment).
>
> Right, will see what Stefano thinks about using test_smoc.
If you meant "test_smoc", that's totally fine.
If you meant "test_smc" I think that must be a test for the virtual SMC
interface that Xen exposes, right? Good we need some tests for vsmc.c
;-)
