> On 10 Aug 2023, at 10:07, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2023 21:51, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Would the x86 maintainers be OK with it too? Of course further changes
>> will be needed to make it useable on x86, but looking at the series from
>> Christopher, the two sets of internal interfaces (dom0less/ARM and
>> hyperlaunch/x86) are very much aligned and similar already.
>
> Moving common code to common/ is surely okay with me. How much wants
> moving is (apparently) a different question.
Would x86 maintainers (and who is taking care of common/) be ok for the dom0less
code to be part of common/ but in this first stage be protected by a dependency
on the
Kconfig ARM?
In a second stage the hyperlaunch people would do the proper modification to
use the
common boot modules to delete that dependency.
Provided that we have an answer for the question Michal raised.
Cheers,
Luca
