On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Jan Beulich wrote: > > - for ( ; ; ) > > + if ( d == NULL ) > > This covers both Xen receiving input and the domain receiving input having > gone away. Originally in the latter case the next sequential (in domid > numbering) domain would be switched to. In the new logic you start over > from the beginning of the domain list. Such a change in behavior (if > deemed acceptable at all, which I'm not convinced of) needs calling out in > the description.
I think it would be best to keep the current behavior as we already have people using it unless we have strong reasons to change it.
