On 05/22/2018 03:37 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/05/18 14:48, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 02:40 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.05.18 at 15:35, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/power.c
>>>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>>>>  
>>>>  uint32_t system_reset_counter = 1;
>>>>  
>>>> +static bool __read_mostly opt_fake_s3 = false;
>>> With the typo in the title (wants to be acpi_sleep) corrected 
>> Oops -- I can fix this on check-in (once the development window opens).
> 
> If this patch is necessary, or at least a useful aid to track down an S3
> bug in Xen 4.11, I vote for its inclusion.
> 
> As far as the change itself goes, it is very simple, with a minimal
> change of any unintended side effects.
> 
> CC'ing the RM for his decision on the subject.

Using `rtcwake -s 10 -m mem`, the only difference I've seen between
suspend with this patch and without is that it doesn't actually sleep
for 10 seconds -- not surprising, as it was never asleep. :-)

I agree that it's quite low risk; but it doesn't seem to me to be very
critical either, which is why I didn't CC Juergen in the first place.
But I'm fine either way.

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to