On Mon Jun 12, 2023 at 10:19 AM CDT, George Dunlap wrote: > Shawn, > > Again sorry that you've sort of bumped a hornet's nest here. > > Just to clarify, the situation as I understand it is:
Hi George, No problem, and thank you for the detailed explanation. > HOWEVER, as Andrew says, there is no official policy at this point; all the > document say is that GPLv2-only is the default unless explicitly stated > otherwise. > > Furthermore, the concerns raised by ARM's legal team were nearly a decade > ago; it's not clear to me whether they still care that much. > > All that to say: If you don't mind and feel that you can do so legally, > then consider switching to GPLv2-only; but if you don't want to and/or feel > that you can't do so legally, feel free to leave it as-is. I'll definitely keep this in mind when creating new files that don't need to include GPLv2+ code. > -George Thanks, Shawn
