On Thu, 8 Jun 2023, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023, Bernhard Beschow wrote: > > Am 22. Mai 2023 15:42:03 UTC schrieb Bernhard Beschow <shen...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > >Am 15. Mai 2023 20:52:40 UTC schrieb Stefano Stabellini > > ><sstabell...@kernel.org>: > > >>On Sat, 13 May 2023, Bernhard Beschow wrote: > > >>> Am 21. April 2023 07:38:10 UTC schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" > > >>> <m...@redhat.com>: > > >>> >On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:41:17AM +0200, Bernhard Beschow wrote: > > >>> >> There is currently a dedicated PIIX3 device model for use under Xen. > > >>> >> By reusing > > >>> >> existing PCI API during initialization this device model can be > > >>> >> eliminated and > > >>> >> the plain PIIX3 device model can be used instead. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Resolving TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE results in less code while also > > >>> >> making Xen > > >>> >> agnostic towards the precise south bridge being used in the PC > > >>> >> machine. The > > >>> >> latter might become particularily interesting once PIIX4 becomes > > >>> >> usable in the > > >>> >> PC machine, avoiding the "Frankenstein" use of PIIX4_ACPI in PIIX3. > > >>> > > > >>> >xen stuff so I assume that tree? > > >>> > > >>> Ping > > >> > > >>I am OK either way. Michael, what do you prefer? > > >> > > >>Normally I would suggest for you to pick up the patches. But as it > > >>happens I'll have to likely send another pull request in a week or two > > >>and I can add these patches to it. > > >> > > >>Let me know your preference and I am happy to follow it. > > > > > >Hi Stefano, > > > > > >Michael's PR was merged last week. How about including this series into > > >your PR then? > > > > Ping > > Sorry for the late reply, it looks like patch #3 breaks the build:
I noticed now that this patch series got committed (the right version without the build failure), thanks Anthony for sending the pull request!
