>>> On 09.05.18 at 00:01, <chao....@intel.com> wrote:
> Mainly for the patch behind which relies on 'nr_phys_cpus' to estimate
> the time needed for microcode update in the worst case.
Leaving aside the aspect of "nr_phys_cpus" not being a suitable name
("nr_online_cores" would come closer imo) I'm not convinced using a
global variable is the way to go here, with just that special purpose
consumer in the next patch. Why can't you work out this count right
there?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
