On 28/04/2023 19:55, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>
>
> The DT functions (dt_read_number(), device_tree_get_reg(), fdt_get_mem_rsv())
> currently accept or return 64-bit values.
>
> In future when we support 32-bit physical address, these DT functions are
> expected to accept/return 32-bit or 64-bit values (depending on the width of
> physical address). Also, we wish to detect if any truncation has occurred
> (i.e. while parsing 32-bit physical addresses from 64-bit values read from
> DT).
>
> device_tree_get_reg() should now be able to return paddr_t. This is invoked by
> various callers to get DT address and size.
>
> For fdt_get_mem_rsv(), we have introduced a wrapper named
> fdt_get_mem_rsv_paddr() which will invoke fdt_get_mem_rsv() and translate
> uint64_t to paddr_t. The reason being we cannot modify fdt_get_mem_rsv() as it
> has been imported from external source.
>
> For dt_read_number(), we have also introduced a wrapper named dt_read_paddr()
> dt_read_paddr() to read physical addresses. We chose not to modify the
> original
> function as it is used in places where it needs to specifically read 64-bit
> values from dt (For e.g. dt_property_read_u64()).
>
> Xen prints warning when it detects truncation in cases where it is not able to
> return error.
>
> Also, replaced u32/u64 with uint32_t/uint64_t in the functions touched
> by the code changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.hal...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com>
~Michal
