The stride values (based on 32-bit element size) were wrong for these two test, yielding misleading output (especially when comparing with the test variants also involving AVX512-VBMI2).
Also insert a missing blank on a nearby, related line. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c @@ -520,10 +520,10 @@ static const struct { SIMD(VAES (EVEX/x64), avx512bw_vaes, 64), AVX512VL(VL+VAES (x16), avx512bw_vaes, 16), AVX512VL(VL+VAES (x32), avx512bw_vaes, 32), - SIMD(VPCLMUL (VEX/x4), avx2_vpclmulqdq, 32), + SIMD(VPCLMUL (VEX/x4), avx2_vpclmulqdq, 32), SIMD(VPCLMUL (EVEX/x8), avx512bw_vpclmulqdq, 64), - AVX512VL(VL+VPCLMUL (x4), avx512bw_vpclmulqdq, 16), - AVX512VL(VL+VPCLMUL (x8), avx512bw_vpclmulqdq, 32), + AVX512VL(VL+VPCLMUL (x2), avx512bw_vpclmulqdq, 16), + AVX512VL(VL+VPCLMUL (x4), avx512bw_vpclmulqdq, 32), SIMD(AVX512_VBMI2+VPCLMUL (x8), avx512vbmi2_vpclmulqdq, 64), AVX512VL(_VBMI2+VL+VPCLMUL (x2), avx512vbmi2_vpclmulqdq, 16), AVX512VL(_VBMI2+VL+VPCLMUL (x4), avx512vbmi2_vpclmulqdq, 32),