On 13/01/2023 11:11, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> From: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
>
> The sequence for flushing the TLBs is 4 instruction long and often
> requires an explanation how it works.
>
> So create a helper and use it in the boot code (switch_ttbr() is left
> alone until we decide the semantic of the call).
>
> Note that in secondary_switched, we were also flushing the instruction
> cache and branch predictor. Neither of them was necessary because:
> * We are only supporting IVIPT cache on arm32, so the instruction
> cache flush is only necessary when executable code is modified.
> None of the boot code is doing that.
> * The instruction cache is not invalidated and misprediction is not
> a problem at boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
>
> ----
> Changes in v4:
> - Expand the commit message to explain why switch_ttbr() is
> not updated.
> - Remove extra spaces in the comment
> - Fix typo in the commit message
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com>
~Michal