On 22.11.2022 08:30, Henry Wang wrote: > Hi Jan, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 174896: regressions - trouble: >> broken/fail/pass >> >> On 22.11.2022 05:40, Henry Wang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> Subject: [xen-unstable test] 174896: regressions - trouble: >> broken/fail/pass >>>> >>>> flight 174896 xen-unstable real [real] >>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/174896/ >>>> >>>> Regressions :-( >>>> >>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >>>> including tests which could not be run: >>>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 <job status> >> broken >>>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 5 host-install(5) broken >> REGR. >>>> vs. 174797 >>>> test-amd64-amd64-examine-bios 5 host-install broken REGR. vs. >>>> 174797 >>>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 12 debian-hvm-install >>>> fail REGR. vs. 174797 >>> >>> Seeing [1] [2] and [3], I guess there is still something wrong or it is >>> just an >> OSSTest glitch? >> >> The first three are certainly osstest / environment issues, which is >> generally the case when a test's status is "broken". The 4th, as >> already said in reply to flight 172089, is a test which sadly fails >> every now and then. So let's hope for another flight and better luck. > > Thanks for the confirmation, this is reassuring and I guess I am getting too > sensitive now :) Sorry I somehow missed your reply to 172089, next time I > will check my inbox history first.
Oh, I'm sorry, no, this was not a complaint in any way. It was merely an attempt to make people look at the state just in case they can see a way to analyze the cause of these random failures; I for one still have no good idea. Jan
