Hi Jan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 2022年11月14日 16:05 > To: Wei Chen <wei.c...@arm.com> > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau > Monné <roger....@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>; Stefano > Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Device tree based NUMA support for Arm - > Part#2 > > So in this patch series, we implement a set of NUMA API to use > > device tree to describe the NUMA layout. We reuse most of the > > code of x86 NUMA to create and maintain the mapping between > > memory and CPU, create the matrix between any two NUMA nodes. > > Except ACPI and some x86 specified code, we have moved other > > code to common. In next stage, when we implement ACPI based > > NUMA for Arm64, we may move the ACPI NUMA code to common too, > > but in current stage, we keep it as x86 only. > > > > This patch serires has been tested and booted well on one > > Arm64 NUMA machine and one HPE x86 NUMA machine. > > > > [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2022- > 06/msg00499.html > > [2] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2021- > 09/msg01903.html > > > > --- > > v7 -> v8: > > 1. Rebase code to resolve merge conflict. > > You mention this here but not in any of the patches. Which leaves > reviewers guessing where the re-base actually was: Re-bases, at > least sometimes, also need (re-)reviewing. >
I just applied the v7 to the latest staging branch, this work has not Generated any new change for this series. I should have described it clear or not mentioned this in cover letter. Sorry for confusing you! Cheers, Wei Chen > Jan
