Hi Jan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] IOMMU/VT-d: wire common device reserved
> memory API
> 
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> >>> <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Henry, can this be included in 4.17? The AMD counterpart went in
> >>> earlier, but due to late review on Intel part, this one didn't.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the information. I agree this is a valid reason, but to be
> >> safe I would like to hear opinions from the x86 maintainers (added
> >> in CC).
> >>
> >> Andrew/Jan/Roger: May I have your feedback about this? Thanks!
> >
> > Hmm, not sure what to say here. Yes, it would be nice for things to end
> > up consistent across vendors. And yes, the change here is largely
> > mechanical (afaics) and to code most of which shouldn't typically be in
> > use on systems anyway, and so should not pose an undue risk. But still
> > it is quite a bit of code churn ...
> 
> Was this lost, did you decide against allowing this in, or were you hoping
> for further responses by others?

Sorry for the confusion. Yeah I was hoping to see if we can have further
responses from others, but it seems no responses so far...

I have the exact same opinion as yours so I am also not sure. But if you
changed your mind and would like to commit the patch for completeness
of the original series, please feel free to add my release-ack. I would not
block this patch.

Kind regards,
Henry

> 
> Jan

Reply via email to