Hi Anthony, > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com> > Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH for-4.17 v5 00/17] Toolstack build system > improvement, toward non-recursive makefiles > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 06:26:09AM +0000, Henry Wang wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > > Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH for-4.17 v5 00/17] Toolstack build system > > > improvement, toward non-recursive makefiles > > > > > > On 13/10/2022 14:04, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > > Patch series available in this git branch: > > > > https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/aperard/xen-unstable.git > > > br.toolstack-build-system-v5 > > > > > > I've done a full rebuild of this (with the 2 noted fixes) with Xapi, and > > > it does resolve the Ocaml library linking issues.� Thanks. > > > > > > So T-by.� If an allowance for 4.17 appears, I can see about getting some > > > of the more obviously-trivial areas reviewed and committed. > > > > Release-acked-by: Henry Wang <henry.w...@arm.com> > > Thanks.
No problem, my pleasure. > > > Since this series is quite large and just out of curiosity, do we have a > > pipeline or CI jobs to test all the modules that affected by the makefile > > touched by this series? Would be good to have some test results to > > boost our confidence of committing the series. > > I did push my branch to Gitlab, and that the pipeline: > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/anthonyper/xen/- > /pipelines/665987083 > (private to xen-project members) > Only failures are I think the same one as on staging, test failure on > arm, but no build issues. Sorry for the arm failure, I will try to respin the patch ASAP and hopefully the CI will be unblocked soon. Kind regards, Henry > > I'm not sure that everything is tested, but most of it is. > > Cheers, > > -- > Anthony PERARD
