On 01/09/2022 11:27, Rahul Singh wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Rahul,
On 24 Aug 2022, at 3:58 pm, Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org> wrote:
Hi Rahul,
On 24/08/2022 14:53, Rahul Singh wrote:
Backport Linux commit dc898eb84b25c39ea46f28c48a169bdbd0e2c7e0
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix l1 stream table size in the error message
We have a tag for this (see Origin). If you use it, then…
Ok.
Original commit message:
You don't need to add "original commit message" here and the content is exactly
the same.
Ok.
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix l1 stream table size in the error message
The actual size of level-1 stream table is l1size. This looks like
an oversight on commit d2e88e7c081ef ("iommu/arm-smmu: Fix LOG2SIZE
setting for 2-level stream tables") which forgot to update the @size
in error message as well.
As memory allocation failure is already bad enough, nothing worse
would happen. But let's be careful.
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzeng...@huawei.com>
AFAICT, you didn't make any change to this patch. So the "From:" should still
be from Zenghui Yu. For an example how to do backport, see
9c432b876bf518866d431bda73f2be1250f688eb "x86/mwait-idle: add SPR support".
Ok.
Also, it would be good to clarify whether they are clean backport and required
some changes (other than context changes). I assume they are clean backports?
Yes all patches are clean back port.
Here is the commit msg please have a look once. Once you confirmed I will modify other patches and send it for review.
It looks fine to me.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall