>>> On 19.04.18 at 10:56, <davidw...@zhaoxin.com> wrote: > Jan , thank you for your explanation. > Your mean : To avoid evaluating the cpumask twice in hpet_detach_channel(), > use a local variable to hold the result of cpumask_first(). Then > cpumask_empty() could be replaced by comparing the value of variable and > nr_cpu_ids. > > I understand it right?
Yes. But please stop top-posting. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
