On 18.08.2022 16:20, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 18.08.22 16:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >> "int" is not a suitable type to hold / receive "time_t" values. >> >> The parameter is presently unused, so no functional change. >> >> Coverity ID: 1509377 >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
Thanks. > The severity of this issue is rather low IMO. A timeout of more than > 60 years not being handled correctly seems to have no relevance at all. Agreed. The tool can't tell that a time_t-type value is used here for a timeout, not a time stamp, and using the correct type is Generally Better™ anyway, imo. Jan
