Hi Jan, > On 11 Aug 2022, at 11:52 am, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > Rename the latter, subsuming the functionality of the former when passed > NULL as first argument. > > Since this requires touching all call sites anyway, take the opportunity > and fold the remaining three parameters into a single pci_sbdf_t one. > > No functional change intended. In particular the locking related > assertion needs to continue to be kept silent when a non-NULL domain > pointer is passed - both vpci_read() and vpci_write() call the function > without holding the lock (adding respective locking to vPCI [or finding > an alternative to doing so] is the topic of a separate series). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.si...@arm.com> Tested-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.si...@arm.com> Regards, Rahul
