On 03.08.2022 11:29, Julien Grall wrote: > On 27/07/2022 08:26, Jan Beulich wrote: >> All, > > Hi Jan, > >> the release is due in about two weeks time. >> >> Please point out backports you find missing from the respective staging >> branch, but which you consider relevant. I'm surprised in particular >> that no Arm backports have appeared on the branch at all since 4.16.1 >> had gone out. > > Stefano is meant to look after the backports so I have held off doing > them (although I don't really want to take that responsability :)). > Below a potential list: > > - af570d1c90f1 "xen/arm: Advertise workaround 1 if we apply 3" > - 95604873ccf5 "arm/its: enable LPIs before mapping the collection table" > - 407b13a71e32 "xen/arm: p2m don't fall over on FEAT_LPA enabled hw" > - aa1cba100bff "xen/arm: Avoid overflow using MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR_MASK" > - ee11f092b515 "xen: arm: Don't use stop_cpu() in halt_this_cpu()" > - 6655eb81092a "xen/arm: avoid overflow when setting vtimer in context > switch" > - 25424d1a6b7b "xen/arm: head: Add missing isb after writing to > SCTLR_EL2/HSCTLR" > - 800f21499e0e "arm/vgic-v3: fix virq offset in the rank when storing > irouter"
Since Julien's mail was directed at me (only), FTAOD: You're going to take care of these, no action needed on my part? Thanks, Jan